Latest Feeds & News From Other Organizations

Latest Feed

The RSS feeds below are updated hourly and provide news reports on child support and parental alienation issues from around the world. 
RSS Articles about Child Support (Worldwide)
RSS Articles regarding parental alienation (Worldwide)

FB & YT Feeds from Various Orgs
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Load more
,
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
We know that in any group of people, there are those with unhealthy habits that make them fit the deadbeat mold. Stop labeling every father who isnt with the mother that way because most of us are great parents and just want to maximize our time with our children. ~Shawn

We know that in any group of people, there are those with unhealthy habits that make them fit the deadbeat mold. Stop labeling every father who isn't with the mother that way because most of us are great parents and just want to maximize our time with our children.

~Shawn ... See MoreSee Less

01.21.25
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • likes love haha sad angry 591
  • Shares: 194
  • Comments: 49

49 CommentsComment on Facebook

Ive got full custody now but, i had to put in the hard yards for years..... Play the long game Kings! *Dont ever give up x

my heart would be broken. I got 50-50 custody of our child we had together. To get that I had to give up everything else through threats and false accusations. I'm so glad I did even though I have no money. I would gladly be gay if I was bent that way. She did her very best to break me, even though I supported her three stepchildren for eight years, was not the one who cheated, and always created a safe, loving, exciting, supportive environment for us. When someone can't take accountability, they have to somehow make you out to be the bad guy, because they don't want everyone judging them.people like that care more about whatever everyone else thinks then they do about what they think of themselves, so no morals

I can’t cope much longer

View more comments

Play

Where are all the blue collar men at?! ... See MoreSee Less

01.20.25
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • likes love haha 286
  • Shares: 31
  • Comments: 32

32 CommentsComment on Facebook

That's right. Nothing else matters to us. Kids dog and home.

I believe it. It's unfortunate. I'm a non custodial parent and when I don't have my son would love to hang out/ date male non custodial parent but most have 100% been scared away of dating again even though I know how it feels and wouldn't repeat. It's just too heartbreaking to chance. Have to stay strong for the kids and we are beyond broke to do ANYTHING

Yes my grandson is always home except for work.

View more comments

Load more
,
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

HOW to (actually) File a Class Action v. Family Courts:

Table of Contents 1. Plan for Federal Court, Not State Court 2. Separate Class Actions per Each Different State 3. Separate Class Actions for NCPs and CPS Victims 4. You Need a Minimum of 110+ Named Co-Plaintiffs 5. You Need an Online Free Self-Registration Form 6. You Should Prepare Additional Groups or Pages 7. Miscellaneous Related Aspects 8. Summary, Expenses, and Action Plan ================================= 1. Plan for Federal Court, Not State Court Because the entire fight is primarily about the *federal* constitutional rights of parents, you are far better off suing in *federal* court to vindicate those same rights than you would be within any lower state court, where you would have to start first, and where - in most States but not all - such judge of a lower general jurisdiction court of any given county probably also handles child custody cases routinely, hence already is totally against your lawsuit goal, not to mention those corresponding issues of disqualification and/or recusal. Parental rights of custody, care, control and management of their minor children (those "legal" and "physical" rights regarding a minor child) are fundamental federal rights of every natural (biological) parent, clearly protected by the federal constitution and very much SCOTUS case law that *limits* the States in regards to these matters. No state case law from any State is going to talk freely and repeatedly about its own State courts being *limited* in these matters, maybe a little, but rarely, and not much. Further very importantly, the general public and media (that you want and need support of) can always access and review any filing by any party or the court itself, directly online via the PACER system, within your federal class action case, whereas while many lower state courts let you see just a case docket and the basic case information online, it is rare to have full online public access to the case filings and case orders themselves for any lower state court case anywhere. Accordingly, any bona fide, actually serious class action lawsuit effort against the family court system of any State will be planned for filing in the given federal court. ================================= 2. Separate Class Actions per Each Different State For a variety of legal and case processing reasons, as well as logistical concerns, plus better ease of attracting the genuine interest and support of your general public, which you will certainly need and want in large numbers behind your big efforts, such class action lawsuits should be filed separately per each State, i.e., filed within the matching federal District Court in the capital city of the State you are suing, even though the class action complaints for different States may be all nearly-identical clones. Of course, this also matches up with state-by-state Facebook groups that already exist with supporting members, all hoping for an authentic, powerful class action plan to unfold. ================================= 3. Separate Class Actions for NCPs and CPS Victims While both realms condemn "family court" practices, and of course both realms share the common core of federally protected parental rights, the NCP "class" set of legal and constitutional issues viable for an authentic "class" action lawsuit are simply not the exact same set of legal and constitutional issues that are viable for an authentic "class" action lawsuit filed for falsely victimized parents and children of CPS cases/actions. Amateurs who don't really understand the more complex areas of mass litigation law propose that everyone send in their personal case info, their own judge's name, and so forth, i.e., trying to make it all a long list of *particular case* examples. But that is *not* what an actual class action lawsuit is... that is doing what is known as a "mass action" or "mass tort" lawsuit - where the process is extremely expensive and time-consuming and almost always very difficult to maintain legally, precisely because the nature is still like fighting each individual case example separately one-at-a-time, at least for proof of that next separate plaintiff's right to stay within the main big "mass" case. An actual "class action" uses a Class of plaintiffs who are all *already* similarly-situated, which means that ALL of the plaintiffs have suffered the (exact) same claimed injuries to their rights and/or persons, i.e., that ALL of the legal *and* factual issues are identical and common amongst ALL of the plaintiffs. There is no *particular case* example used within any actual class action, no particular judge name, no particular rogue county and/or court name, nor any other such *variable* piece of information (except the plaintiffs' own respective personal names of course), precisely because the whole point is that everything, including ALL factual allegations, as well as ALL legal claims and legal theories of liability and relief sought of any kind, are ALL uniformly common amongst and to ALL of the entire such Class of co-plaintiffs. Victims of NCP family courts have a different set of Class-common-wide legal and factual issues, than does the Class comprised of falsely victimized parents/families of CPS family courts. So not only should a class action v. family court be filed in a federal court, but it should be done by victims of a single State's family court system by suing that same State itself, and they need to be separately done for NCP Class issues versus CPS Class issues. However, both Classes (NCP/CPS) actually do share the basic, core "opening salvo" legal foundation in common, hence that portion of separate type class action lawsuit complaints can be basically cloned/shared: All natural (biological) parents already have full custody rights to their child from the moment of the child's birth, those parental rights are fundamental rights, it is well established that those rights are protected by due process, the State government is limited in regards to parental rights by (X, Y and Z), and so forth and so on. ================================= 4. You Need a Minimum of 110+ Named Co-Plaintiffs To actually do a real class action v. [anything], you must have, by law, an absolute minimum of 100+ co-plaintiffs that all exist and perfectly fit the Class. For attempting to shut down a State's family court system, you had better already be prepared with an actual set of 100+ co-plaintiff parent victims, each and all individually named in the complaint that starts your new federal case on Day One, or else by starting out on Day One with at least a full handful of "lead" plaintiffs listed on the complaint but also already be ready to file a list of those other 100+ co-plaintiffs on Day Two. And just like the vetting confirmation process for counting enough petition signatures as valid for a candidate for political office finally getting his or her name officially onto the election ballot, you had better actually have like at least 110+ such total co-plaintiffs all lined up and named for that complaint (by Day Two at the latest) to avoid any question of having an actual minimum "Class" in numbers that sufficiently satisfy the federal court to "certify" that your Class does, indeed, exist, and therefore that your Class can proceed as a bona fide Class with its "class" action lawsuit against your State of interest. So, whether NCP class action or CPS class action, you need at least 110+ co-plaintiff parents already identified and lined up as Class victims of your State, in order to name them each by name as another co-plaintiff for your complaint by the time you file the class action case. It is *not* recommended to try and take down the entire family court system of any State by using only a handful of listed "putative" co-plaintiffs named "on behalf of" a merely-proposed "Class" that is alleged to exist, and then you have to go through legal fights with your opposition to prove existence of the alleged Class (the Attorney General of your State of interest, and any "amici" organizations that jump into the case to oppose you - because family law professionals, state actors, and/or their mainstream media friends, all want to oppose your efforts, so they told their allies about your new class action case). Instead, just bypass and avoid and automatically win that entire Class threshold fight, by simply preparing enough fellow co-plaintiffs to already be on board in advance of filing the brand new class action lawsuit when ready. With a solid 100+ (110+) co-plaintiffs, you automatically win the entire Class threshold fight. This is an easy number, obtainable from multiple brands of existing state-by-state family court groups for any of the more populated States, let alone via combining from any/all such groups..., but may require more networking for a lesser populated State. The basic eligibility criteria for any Class co-plaintiff (any "Member" of the "Class"), whether for the NCP Class or the CPS Class, is simply whether or not their own personal family court child custody case either (1) is still pending, active, current, live or otherwise still in effect, i.e., the constitutional injuries are presently continuing, or (2) their own same personal child custody case was still last active anytime within the applicable statute of limitations period of your given State law. While there are multiple federal grounds available to each of the NCP Class and the CPS Class, one of those statutory vehicles will be the venerable Section 1983 (42 USC 1983). Because Section 1983 has no statute of limitations of its own, federal courts use the personal injury statute of the State in question for claims made under Section 1983. Most States have personal injury statute of limitations periods of either 2 or 3 years, although it varies from just 1 year up to 6 years. Alternatively, your particular State may have a special statute of limitations with a longer period (4 or 5 years) for the specific grounds of civil rights violations or constitutional torts and/or other rights violations, or something very similar in legal nature. A secondary criteria of the NCP Class is that each Member of the Class (each such eligible co-plaintiff NCP parent victimized by a state family court of your State in question) has been treated as a "less than equal" parent, i.e., has less than fully equal 50/50 true shared parenting time with their natural (biological) child/ren. A parent who enjoys either full 50/50 custody or has "primary" (more than 50%) custody, by definition, is NOT being denied their equal parenting rights, and hence is not eligible. To be eligible to complain for relief as a co-plaintiff in the NCP Class, said NCP parent has to be actually suffering from denial of equal parenting rights, i.e., the parent is treated as a so-called "noncustodial" parent **with less than an equal share** of child custody rights than what the other parent enjoys. The final, third criteria of each NCP Class Member (each NCP co-plaintiff against your same State in question) is that they have never been found by a CPS agency of any "substantiated" child abuse or neglect or abandonment. In most NCP child custody cases, there are never any real CPS issues to even consider in the first place, yet false allegations of child abuse or neglect or abandonment are not an uncommon smear tactic to gain an upper hand within the child custody case. But even in such cases, as long as nothing was substantiated by CPS, the NCP parent is still eligible. For the CPS victim Class, it's basically just the above-described statute(s) of limitations criteria, and that's it - either the CPS case is currently pending, or last was sometime within the applicable statute of limitations. ================================= 5. You Need an Online Free Self-Registration Form Remember, your overall primary goal of everything is to attract AND engage the interest of large affected swaths of the general public to support you. People see many news blips pass by daily, but allowing them to JOIN your new class action case (for free, and easily) sets you apart - NOW you have their *full* attention. Not just for building your opening salvo of 110+ named co-plaintiff Members, but especially for thousands upon thousands who want to actually join your brand new federal case just filed (because your original state team spread the news quickly thereafter), you need to have an online self-registration form, with the least possible number of basic legal Class criteria questions to answer, just enough to cover self-qualifying as a proper Member of the Class, available for all other eligible parents out there to easily fill out that straightforward form and actually join you too. Your online form should include a final checkbox question which has to be affirmatively clicked to self-acknowledge swearing under 28 USC 1746 (the federal self-notary statute) to the truth of all answers provided upon the form. And with that legal attestation yes-clicked by all new self-registrants swearing they are eligible members of the Class, you can then sporadically print out and file another spreadsheet, directly into the federal case, of each next batch of hundreds or thousands of just-joined new Class Members. ================================= 6. You Should Prepare Additional Groups or Pages The actual written law has always been on your side, protecting parental rights as fundamental rights fully entitled to real and valid due process. But what you have still always needed is large new numbers of supporters joining you to finally bypass the mainstream media, by going independently viral with a uniform message appealing to millions and millions of other disenfranchised parents and families across the nation who still have no idea yet that your online support groups even exist. If you are thinking ahead smartly, you don't really want to just direct 1000+ newcomers into any one (1) single State-specific social media group, let alone 10k or more, because that would tend to result in utter chaos. Instead, by the time your state team is ready to actually file the new class action lawsuit, you should already have prepared and waiting an entire set of "sub" groups to join, or pages to follow, representing geographical areas of your State, i.e., either for each of the fairly more populated counties of your State ("parishes" in LA, "boroughs" in AK), if not all of your counties, or at least go by each different federal court "Division" in your State, where each "Division" is over a given cluster of counties and is usually named for which city is where that single federal courthouse is located. In your State of interest, there are 1-4 main federal court "Districts" (if more than one, then typically Northern, Southern, Central, etc.), and then within each such District are a few to several Division clusters of counties. For example, the State of Texas has 254 different counties, so that would be a lot of new groups/pages to set up, but using the federal court breakdown, all of those 254 counties are geo-divided into just 29 Division clusters, so setting up just 29 new groups or pages is a far more manageable number to start off with. Your core team decides which way is best for your own State of interest, but either way, you'll want to provide an online list of all such group/page links, so all the new people can go directly to the County or Division group/page that matches their own personal interest. Ideally, you want that list of group/page links to be on a single webpage, along with the above-described online self-registration form, and some basic info about the class action case. Everyone amongst your initial 110+ co-plaintiffs, or at least most/many of them, should likely be amongst your own State-level leaders and Division-level leaders to start off with, with County-level leaders added as it grows. ================================= 7. Miscellaneous Related Aspects A) Your State itself will be the solely named Defendant, and you will formally "serve process" upon the State via serving the duly designated state-level official(s), which is always either the Governor, the Secretary of State, or both, so to avoid any confusion and ensure covering all bases, just plan to serve process upon both, plus a courtesy copy of every filing within your opening salvo of brand new case filings also delivered to the Attorney General of your State (by just simply sending by email with attachments, or as paper copies sent by normal, regular, everyday first class snail mail). B) The actual Class Members (co-plaintiffs of any large number) in the case against your State in question do not necessarily need to live, or have ever lived, within that State you are suing. Whether you are talking about an NCP class action, or a CPS class action, the majority of your victim parent co-plaintiffs will still reside somewhere within the same given State, sure, of course, but some of your Class co-plaintiff parents will be living in other States. Their current residence, as long as it is within any of the 50 States, is not what matters on a primary legal basis, but their main qualification factor is which court (a court of which State?) violated their parental rights without proper due process. It would be highly unusual for a CPS false victim parent to have more than a single State of interest for these legal matters, but it is not unheard of that an NCP might have child custody cases with multiple prior partners in multiple States, and such rarer NCPs are perfectly qualified to register and join each such matching State class action case. Again, it's all about which State (by its court or courts) violated you and your rights, not necessarily where you live. However, for complex legal discussions beyond the plan being presented herein, and whether NCP or CPS, you may not allow victimized parents who live outside of the 50 States to join your Class, i.e., none who live within DC itself, none who live on any of the Island territories (Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, etc.), and none who live in any foreign country. Just within any of the 50 States themselves, only, for the current residence criteria. C) Within the new case filed, your statewide Class will either have to be represented by one (1) or more attorney(s), or you may actually function pro se as a group, by acting as an "unincorporated association" which is a recognized legal entity that may sue on behalf of its own common membership without needing any attorney. Yes, for those scholars that want to argue that a class action can "only" be done by a licensed attorney pursuant to federal civil Rule 23 and corresponding case law, those are the normally applicable requirements. But that is not the whole and entire law upon that subject, as unincorporated associations are exempt from that requirement if they choose. For our discussion purposes here, all of you members of this social media group are *already* acting *mostly* as an unincorporated association, legally speaking, as long as you have the "finishing touches" in place too, i.e., including an actual organizational name of your association whatever that may be, also a published list of at least top-level leadership of the entire membership, and at least basic rules regarding membership posted for all members. So the "several" entire top-level leadership, say 5, 7 or 9 leaders (an odd number for voting purposes), acting as a group pro se together (jointly signing all the legal paperwork) is allowed to represent (only) all of the other current members (and any future members in theoretical terms) of its own entire associational membership - without requiring a licensed attorney to represent everyone in the court case. See, e.g.: Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Bar, 377 U.S. 1 (1964); N.A.A.C.P. v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963); NAACP v. West Virginia ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449, 458-460 (1958); Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516, 523 (1960); Louisiana ex rel. Gremillion v. NAACP, 366 U.S. 293, 296 (1961); Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652, 666 (1925); Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 324 (1937); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 303 (1940); Staub v. City of Baxley, 355 U.S. 313, 321 (1958); De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353, 364 (1937); and, etc. Indeed, numerous citations made within the above cases point to many *other* cases protecting the same rights of pro se litigants to engage and litigate as a group. Finding (let alone trusting implicitly) any attorney to fight hard (and true) against the State's wayward family court system is going to be very difficult, if not nigh impossible. But you can actually proceed as a pro se group of associational leaders for (only) your own associational members, which is all you need to sue, fight and win. D) There is a federal court filing fee for any new civil case, plus mandatory administrative fees that get tacked on at the same time, which overall total is presently $405. While an individual person proceeding pro se may submit an affidavit for proof of financial hardship and so request the federal court to waive the filing fees in whole or part for their own standalone pro se case, that just doesn't apply to a class action case at all. Also, check online to see what form(s) of payment the clerk at your given federal courthouse will accept for filing your new case. Not all federal courts accept cash, but some do. Not all accept personal checks, but some do. Not all accept cards, but some do. E) The *only* rational scenario where you might contradict the guidance of Section #4 above, by planning to file the class action against your State with just a "handful" of "lead" putative co-plaintiffs initially named in the complaint, is ONLY when you have literally *everything* else done and waiting in the wings, ready for "go" on the very next day after filing your brand new case - especially with still having those same 100+ co-plaintiffs already registered up via that online form, that you will use to print and file that spreadsheet of those same 100+ new Class Members directly into the case on that second business day of your new case existence. If your choice of paragraph "C" options above is to represent your Class by your own unincorporated association, then your 5-9 state-level leaders would best be that "handful" of "lead" putative co-plaintiffs for filing the opening salvo on Day One, and then on Day Two that same team of lead plaintiffs would file the spreadsheet of their 100+ additional Class Members into the case, and so securing the automatic win regarding the Class numerosity threshold without ever having to litigate about that question. F) I authored this Lesson. I have 26+ years and 400+ state and federal court cases of paid legal client experience as a ghost attorney, in all levels of courts across the country, mostly assisting pro se parents with their constitutional rights applied in family law and related cases, but also successful work in various other areas of law. My experience includes some class action and MDL (multi-district litigation) work as well. For the NCP world, I also happen to have an already-drafted class action template just waiting for use by any such serious handfuls of state-by-state action teams, and I am willing to also privately assist such state teams in the background. For the CPS world, I am fully aware of the set of Class-wide (systemic) constitutional issues that such a lawsuit could be developed upon. Back in the late 1990s, I was insanely sued for "divorce" with kids, even though we had never been married, hence my own primary focus upon NCP issues over the many years. I know the law well from supporting our mutual perspective via an emphasis upon the fundamental federal rights of all natural parents, and of any natural parent. ================================= 8. Summary, Expenses, and Action Plan Whether represented by some unusual-find attorney actually willing to take the unconstitutional family court system head on, or whether by a state team acting as a pro se group to represent their associational membership, you first need that "handful" group of same-Class victim parents to be that top state-level core team. I recommend that core team number be either 5 or 7 or 9 parents (not 6 or 8), and preferably 9 for at least the four (4) most populated States of CA, TX, FL and NY, if not also for each of the next several most populated States, and 7 or 9 for any state team is great, but you need at least a minimum of 5 passionate, motivated and dedicated leaders to form your state team. Before you finally file the brand new class action case, you first need that online self-registration form, so you can start getting at least your first 110+ co-plaintiffs all lined up (so you network amongst the social media groups until you have that minimum number signed up on your form), and then after that step gets started, your state core team will need to add a new set of either Division and/or County groups as desired, for all the new people to flock into, included as a linked listing online along with your self-registration form. Your state team's costs to kick off and file the new class action include the $405 new federal case filing fee, two (2) process server deliveries to serve your State Governor and Secretary of State (expect $50-$150 for each separate service performed, so about $100-$300 total), and enough printer/copier ink and paper to make about 10-12 total copies each of the main lawsuit complaint itself plus also of several supporting papers/forms. In exact terms, you will need the "originals" of each paper filing (your class action complaint itself, plus standard intake forms, and any supporting filings you have added to the opening salvo), which "originals" are just the blue (medium blue) pen ink, hand-signed "original" copy of each different paper filed, plus one (1) additional copy set for the federal court itself to keep, two (2) more copy sets of every paper in the opening salvo for "service of process" upon the Governor and Secretary of State as described above, an additional paper copy set if you are going to snail mail the courtesy copy set to your state Attorney General as described above instead of using email, and of course every initial "lead" plaintiff of your state team listed and named upon the face of the complaint will want his/her own copy to keep for their records (presuming the state team will act as a pro se group to represent their unincorporated association). Your team will also need at least a very basic website for your online self-registration form and that listing of linked new Division/County groups, listing of any/all leadership as desired, and basic case information for the general public (and any media), so website costs for any reasonably-named domain must be included in your plan, and I strongly suggest using a really good online forms service platform like Jotform.com or anything similar, so that monthly fee as well, instead of some cheapie/free forms platform. At minimum, you need an online forms service platform that lets you save/download all form submissions directly into a spreadsheet file like Excel, or at least as the full data itself so that you can make your own spreadsheet later. Your core state team itself should include your best 2-3+ legal scholars (regardless if you find and use that unusual attorney or not), 1-2+ people that can handle making a basic decent website with the self-registration form and so forth, and 1-2+ people to setup all new Groups/Pages for either those Divisions and/or Counties as desired. Your state-level team will choose the (any reasonable) name of your statewide unincorporated association. If you've reviewed this class action plan before your fellow advocates have, then just take the initiative to reach out to those interested in (screwed by) the same State as yourself. Just BE a real leader and get the ball finally rolling. You can start now by simply announcing your interest for [name of State] in the comments below. ... See MoreSee Less

01.21.25
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • likes love 9
  • Shares: 4
  • Comments: 2

2 CommentsComment on Facebook

Viridiana Arellano Mira

Iowa

... See MoreSee Less

01.18.25
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • likes love sad 314
  • Shares: 17
  • Comments: 16

16 CommentsComment on Facebook

Glad to see this. Women doing this is far more common than a lot of women are willing to admit

Too bad they have to wait till they are 18 to fight it.

View more comments

Load more
,
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
PlayPissed Off Parent Podcast 10/9/2024

🎙️ Pissed Off Parent Podcast: Financial Survival Guide! 💰

Are you tired of feeling overwhelmed by your finances? Join me for an eye-opening episode of the Pissed Off Parent Podcast, where we'll tackle the essential topic of money management and how to save effectively!In this episode, we'll dive into practical tips and strategies for budgeting, cutting expenses, and boosting your savings—all while navigating the unique challenges parents face. From setting realistic financial goals to finding hidden savings in your everyday spending, we've got you covered!i'll also share personal stories, expert insights, and answers to your burning questions about family finances. Whether you're struggling to make ends meet or simply looking to build a more secure financial future, this episode is packed with valuable information you won’t want to miss!📅 Tune in and discover how to take control of your finances—because being a parent shouldn’t break the bank! Don't forget to subscribe and share your thoughts in the comments. Let’s turn those financial frustrations into actionable solutions! 💪💸#PissedOffParent #Finance #MoneySavingTips #Budgeting #FamilyFinance #Podcast ... See MoreSee Less

10.09.24
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • likes 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

0 CommentsComment on Facebook

PlayPissed Off Parent Podcast

🧠 Pissed Off Parent Show: Mental Health Special 🎙️

Join us for an important discussion on Mental Health, with a focus on the unique challenges divorced parents face, including a resource especially for veterans navigating family life. We’ll dive into co-parenting tips to help you find peace amidst the chaos, and engage with YOU through live polls to get your thoughts.📽️ PLUS, we’ll feature a fan-made video, matrix style. This is a community-driven episode you don’t want to miss! ... See MoreSee Less

09.28.24
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • likes 1
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

0 CommentsComment on Facebook

PlayPissed Off Parent Podcast

Fathers, it's time to speak up! Join us on the next episode of the Pissed Off Parent Podcast as we tackle the hard-hitting issues facing dads in today's family court system. Here’s what we’ll be diving into:

🔥 Why the System is Rigged Against DadsUncover the truth behind the bias in family courts that leaves fathers fighting uphill battles for their kids.💸 The Real Cost of Child SupportWe break down the financial toll child support takes on fathers and how the system punishes dads, even when they're doing their best.⚖️ The Fight for 50/50: Why Aren’t We There Yet?Why isn’t equal shared parenting the norm? We’ll explore the legal and political roadblocks stopping fathers from getting equal time with their children.👨‍👧‍👦 The Future of FatherhoodHow can we fix this broken system? We’ll discuss the changes that need to happen and what fathers can do to take action NOW.Don’t miss this raw, unfiltered discussion! Tune in.💪 ... See MoreSee Less

09.21.24
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • likes 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

0 CommentsComment on Facebook

PlayThe Pissed Off Parent podcast

Reimagined the show to bring you more unfiltered, real-talk about parents' struggles in the family court system, with a special focus on fathers’ rights and parental alienation. 💔

Get ready for raw stories, expert interviews, and actionable tips to help YOU fight back against the injustices in the system. Whether you’re navigating custody battles, co-parenting nightmares, or advocating for equal shared parenting – we’ve got you covered. 🎯💬 New episodes coming soon! Join the conversation, share your story, and let’s work together to make some real change. 🚀 #PissedOffParent #FathersRights #ParentalAlienation #EqualParenting #FamilyCourtReformStay tuned! 🔥👊 ... See MoreSee Less

09.07.24
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • likes 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

0 CommentsComment on Facebook

Load more

Other areas of interest:

Abuse By Women
Preparing For Divorce/Breakup
Blog
Therapy
Latest Feeds

I am not an attorney. More importantly, I am not YOUR attorney. The information provided on this website/app does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only.  

WP RSS Plugin on WordPress